STATE OF CONNECTICUT
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
2003 AND
2004 CONTRACTING AND
ETHICS
LEGISLATION
July 19, 2004
2004-R-0571
By: By: Jennifer Gelb, Associate Attorney
Sandra Norman-Eady, Chief Attorney
You asked for a summary of 2003 and 2004 legislation on state
contracting and ethics.
SUMMARY
The following are bill summaries of raised and, to a limited
extent, proposed bills on state contracting and ethics. We did not summarize
provisions unrelated to these areas. The only proposed bills included are those
that received a public hearing.
Of the 24 bills fitting this description in 2004, six became law.
Only one of the 17 bills in these areas became law in 2003. The bills that did
not become law died in committee or on the House Calendar.
Some bills had similar concepts. In this case, only one of the
bills became law. For example, in 2004 HJ 2, SB 586, SB 624 (PA 04-204), and HB
5019 all sought to protect the State Ethics Commission’s funding.
2004 PUBLIC ACTS
Contracting
PA 04-102, An Act Concerning Debarment Reform
This act expands the state’s debarment law by barring general
contractors on public construction projects from awarding work to
subcontractors that have violated the prevailing wage law. The state’s
debarment law already prohibits state and municipal agencies from awarding
contracts to general contractors that have violated the prevailing wage law.
The act also establishes a $ 1,000-per-day civil penalty for
prevailing wage violators that perform work on a public construction project (effective
October 1,
2004).
PA 04-141 An Act Revising Prequalification Requirements for State
Construction Contracts
This act makes several changes to the laws governing public
construction, including who may work on public construction projects, the requirements
for obtaining this work, and reports and evaluations on the quality of the
work. Most of these changes are to PA 03-215, which established new procedures
for bidding on and awarding public construction contracts most of which become
effective on October 1, 2004. That act’s prequalification provisions became
effective on July 1, 2004 and its status report requirements were effective on
January 1, 2004.
Specifically, the act:
1. expands the Department of Public Works (DPW) commissioner’s and
State Properties Review Board’s (SPRB) responsibilities regarding state
agencies’ office space needs;
2. makes changes to contractor prequalification laws, including
requiring new information on prequalification applications, and adding new
grounds for disqualification;
3. changes the process for awarding emergency, no-bid contracts
beginning October 1, 2004;
4. increases the information that the DPW commissioner and each
member of the construction awards panel must prepare on the selection process;
5. makes the contractor evaluations that
each state agency must prepare after a construction project is completed
available to all agencies for their use in assessing the contractor’s fitness
for future projects;
6. absolves from liability agencies and their employees who
complete the evaluations;
7. delays for two years, from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2006, awarding
authorities’ duty to complete status reports on construction projects;
8. eliminates a requirement for
municipalities to complete the reports; and
9. requires DPW regulations to include
objective criteria for evaluating contract proposals.
Ethics and
the Watchdog Agencies
PA 04-38, An Act Making Certain Reforms to the State Ethics Codes
This act makes several changes to the State Codes of Ethics. It:
1. increases, from three to five years, the statute of limitations
for filing complaints of ethics violations with the State Ethics Commission;
2. increases the maximum civil penalty for
ethics code violations from $ 2,000 to $ 10,000;
3. doubles the time, from 90 to 180 days, the state has to bring an
action to void a contract entered into in violation of the ethics code; and
4. raises the penalty and criminal classification for intentional
ethics code violations from a class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to
one year in prison, a $ 2,000 fine, or both, to a class D felony, which is
punishable by up to five years in prison, a $ 5,000 fine, or both. A person
convicted of a felony loses the right to become an elector and cannot vote,
hold public office, or run for office, although he can have these rights
restored (effective July 1, 2004
Please go to this website for further information…. http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2004/rpt/2004-R-0571.htm